Archive

Posts Tagged ‘Republican’

2016 Election by the Numbers

August 15, 2016 Leave a comment

Since the beginning of the 2016 US primary elections, I’ve been working on a chart showing the election numbers. I updated it in early August 2016 with all of the official results that were available at the time. Follow this link for the entire chart on Google Drive, or scroll through here on my blog (it’s easier to see in Google Drive).

 

 

At the end of July, Pew Research Center crunched some numbers and came up with an interactive web page to show where each candidate’s votes went, from March 2015 to June 2016. I’ve tried to crunch the numbers even further to estimate the votes at the general election in November, but it’s been a difficult challenge, with so many candidates this year, and so many variables to contend with. For instance, some candidates dropped out very shortly after the first primary was held in Iowa on February 1, 2016, yet their names still appeared on many ballots, or their names were written in, so they still received votes. Also, 2 states didn’t report popular vote totals, making this even more difficult. Of course, this is politics, and things change on a dime here in the US. It’s all just a guessing game until November 9th, and even then we might not know the results (anyone remember Bush?).

 

Pew Democrats Pew Republicans


Republican – December through April

Let’s get the more difficult party out of the way first. Republicans started out with well over a dozen candidates in 2015.  Only the top 11 were given a spot on the PRC chart, and out of those, only 4 were serious contenders. In the “other” column on my main chart, I’ve included all votes that weren’t for the top 4. On the 2nd and 3rd sheets of my chart, I’ve broken down the votes of the 10 top contenders.  Since Walker dropped out before the first primary vote was cast, I’m not going to include him in any official totals except the overall “other” votes (some people wrote his name in), even though he was included on the PRC chart.

There appears to be a huge discrepancy between the December 2015 survey and the actual numbers at the polls, but that’s more a matter of timing than anything else. To understand what I’m talking about, there were 31,168,591 votes cast for all Republicans during the primaries (more, if we could get the actual votes from the 2 states that didn’t release totals). If a candidate was shown to have 1% of the vote in December, he or she should have seen roughly 300,000 actual votes. Most of the candidates didn’t even see ¼ of that. Part of the reason for that is because the survey was done in December, yet the first vote wasn’t cast until February, and another part of the reason is because the candidates dropped out very early in the race.

We’ll start with the December 2015 PRC survey.  I’ll list the candidates in the order they dropped out of the race, the percentage of votes they had at each point, the actual numbers they had at the polls, and where their votes went according to the April 2016 PRC survey. For some, the numbers were too small for the PRC to accurately estimate the percentage that went to other candidates, so I’ve tried to eyeball it as best as I can. Almost all candidates continued to get votes even after they dropped out, presumably because their name was still on the ballot (too late to amend them?) and people were either unaware that they’d dropped out, or were just loyal to them, regardless.

Huckabee dropped out on February 1st. PRC said he had 1% of the vote in December. From December through April, he received 49,658 votes. Eyeballing the PRC chart, his votes went in 6 directions, with Trump receiving a slightly higher percentage than the others. So let’s say that Trump got 20% (9,931), leaving each of the remaining 5 candidates 16% (7,946). Paul’s votes were split between 5 other candidates and himself, with what looks to be 20% going 4 ways, and 10% going 2 ways. Christie’s votes went 7 directions, including himself, with Trump getting the lion’s share (25%) , and Kasich getting a tiny bit more (15%) than the remaining 5 (12%). Fiorina’s votes were split 7 ways, including herself, with Kasich (16%) getting a tiny bit more than the others (14%). Bush’s votes went 7 ways, including himself, with Cruz (20%) and Kasich (18%) in the lead, followed by Trump (16%), Undecided (13%), Bush (13%) retaining votes, Other (10%) and Rubio (10%) bringing up the rear. Carson’s votes were split 9 ways, including himself, with all the percentages given on the PRC chart (Rubio and Paul had 1%, Fiorina had <1%, which left her with only 3 votes, so I reduced theirs to .9% each and gave her .2%). Rubio’s votes were split 8 ways, including himself, with all the percentages given on the PRC chart.


Huckabee – 2/1 – 1% – 49,658 > Trump 9,931 – Cruz 7,945 – Kasich 7,945 – Rubio 7,945 – Other 7,946 – Undecided 7,946

Paul – 2/3 – 2% – 60,689 > Trump 12,137 – Cruz 12,137 – Kasich 6,068 – Other 6,073 – Undecided 12,137  – Paul 12,137
Christie – 2/10 – 2% – 55,386 > Trump 13,847 – Cruz 6,646 – Kasich 8,308 – Bush 6,646 – Other 6,646 – Undecided 6,647 – Christie 6,646
Fiorina – 2/10 – 1% – 37,017 > Trump 5,182 – Cruz 5,182 – Kasich 5,925 – Rubio 5,182 – Other 5,182 – Undecided 5,182 – Fiorina 5,182
Bush – 2/20 – 4% – 271,283 > Trump 43,405 – Cruz 54,256 – Kasich 48,830 – Rubio 27,128 – Other 27,126 – Undecided 35,269 – Bush 35,269
Carson – 3/4 – 10% – 723,775 > Trump 253,321 – Cruz 246,083 – Kasich 79,615 – Rubio 6,514 – Paul 6,514 – Fiorina 1,449 – Other 21,714 – Undecided 65,139 – Carson 43,426
Rubio – 3/15 – 10% – 3,515,648 > Trump 738,286 – Cruz 914,068 – Kasich 1,019,537 – Carson 17,578 – Paul 17,578 – Other 246,099 – Undecided 140,625 – Rubio 421,877

 

Trump, Cruz, and Kasich also had some votes shift between December and April, which will affect the final calculations. No dates, as they hadn’t dropped out at this point. Kasich’s votes were split 5 ways, with himself retaining about 40% of the votes, and the others each getting 15%. For Trump’s split, I had to divide the best I could between Kasich (1.5%), Rubio (.4%) and Paul (.1%). All other information comes from the PRC chart.


Cruz – 14% – 6,914,585 > Trump 1,313,772 – Kasich 553,167 – Rubio 69,146 – Carson 138,292 – Paul 34,572 – Fiorina 34,572 – Other 207,437 – Undecided 345,729 – Cruz 4,217,898

Kasich – 1% – 3,705,077 > Trump 555,761 – Cruz – 555,761 – Other 555,761 – Undecided 555,761 – Kasich 1,482,033
Trump – 34% – 10,184,988 > Cruz 1,018,498 – Kasich 152,775 – Rubio 40,740 – Paul 10,184 – Other 305,550 – Undecided 712,950 – Trump 7,944,291

 

Our December through April totals are as follows:

Trump – 10,889,933
Kasich – 3,364,203
Cruz – 7,038,474
Rubio – 578,532
Carson – 199,296
Bush – 41,915
Fiorina – 41,203
Christie – 6,646
Paul – 80,985
Undecided – 1,887,385
Other – 1,521,290 (Other 1,389,037 + other candidates not listed 131,756)
Grand total  of Repbulican votes Dec – Apr – 25,649,862


Democrat – December through April

Using the same formula for the Democrats for the same time period, excluding Biden and Warren altogether, since they weren’t officially part of the race after December 2015. I’ll only be using Clinton, Sanders and O’Malley’s totals. That should make things a lot easier! O’Malley was the only one to drop out during this time-frame, also after the first day of primaries. His votes were split 5 ways, including himself, so an easy 20% split, with Biden’s share going to Other.  Sanders and Clinton also had a vote shift.  All information from the PRC chart, with percentages, noted in parenthesis.


O’Malley – 2/1 – 1% – 101,751 > Clinton 20,350 – Sanders 20,350 – Undecided 20,350 – Other 20,350 – O”Malley 20,351
Sanders – 29% – 9,761,077 > Clinton 1,561,772 – Undecided 683,275 – Other (1.7%) 165,939 – O’Malley (.3%) 29,284 – Sanders 7,320,807
Clinton – 48% – 12,985,404 > Sanders 2,467,226 – Undecided 1,038,832 – Other (2.5%) 324,636 – O’Malley (.5%) 64,928 – Clinton 9,089,782

 

Again, using the same formula as above for the Republicans, our totals for Democrats are:

Clinton – 10,671,904
Sanders – 9,808,383
O’Malley – 114,563
Total Undecided – 1,742,457
Other – 762,675 (Other 510,925  + other candidates not listed 251,750)
Grand total of Democrat votes Dec – Apr – 23,099,982


Republican – May through June

That brings us to the next set of totals – May through June. Again, the same formulas were used, except for Huckabee with <1% of the vote in April, who didn’t show a vote shift on the PRC chart, and had 1,780 votes. His votes will be included in with the “others” in the grand total.  We’re also adding a new column – Neither – which should make things more interesting.


Paul – 2/3 – 1% – 6,104 > Trump (50%) 3,052 – Clinton (25%) 1,526 – Neither (25%) 1,526
Christie – 2/10 – <1% – 2,465 > Trump (100%) 2,465
Fiorina – 2/10 – <1% – 3,661 > Trump (100%) 3,661
Bush – 2/20 – 1% – 15,618 > Trump (67%) 10,464 – Neither (33%) 5,154
Carson – 3/4 – 1% – 133,289 > Trump (90%) 119,960 – Clinton (10%) 13,329
Rubio – 3/15 – 2% – 20,508 > Trump (90%) 18,458 – Clinton (5%) 1,025 – Neither (5%) 1,025
Cruz – 5/3 – 23% – 871,528 > Trump (87%) 758,230 – Clinton (10%) 87,153 – Neither (3%) 26,145
Kasich – 5/4- 10% – 583,155 > Trump (78%) 454,861 – Clinton (20%) 116,631 – Neither (2%) 11,663
Trump – 44% – 3,843,846 > Trump (96%) 3,690,092 – Clinton (3.9%) 149,910 – Neither (.1%) 3,844

Grand total of Republican votes May – Jun – 5,518,729 (votes above (5,480,174) + other candidates not listed (36,775) + Huckabee’s (1,780) votes)


Democrat – May through June

O’Malley – 2/1 – <1% – 9,509 > Clinton (100%) 9,509
Sanders – July – 37% – 3,985,988 > Clinton (90%) 3,587,389 – Trump (9%) 358,739 – Neither (1%) 39,860
Clinton – 46% – 4,497,412 > Clinton (95%) 4,272,542 – Trump (4%) 179,896 – Neither (1%) 44,974

Grand total of Democrat votes May – Jun – 8,611,203 (votes above (8,492,909) + other candidates not listed (118,294) )


Combined Republican and Democrat – December through June

This is where things get interesting. I’ll be combining each candidate’s totals from the first part (Dec – Apr) and the second part (May – Jun), showing their vote shifts as a combined total.

Paul – 87,089 > Trump (50%) 43,545 – Clinton (25%) 21,772 – Neither (25%) 21,772
Christie – 9,111 > Trump (100%) 9,111
Fiorina – 44,864 > Trump (100%) 44,864
Bush – 57,533 > Trump (67%) 38,547 – Neither (33%) 18,986
Carson – 332,585 > Trump (90%) 299,326 – Clinton (10%) 33,259

Rubio – 599,040 > Trump (90%) 539,136 – Clinton (5%) 29,952 – Neither (5%) 29,952
Cruz – 7,910,002 > Trump (87%) 6,881,703 – Clinton (10%) 791,000 – Neither (3%) 237,299
Kasich – 3,947,358 > Trump (78%) 3,078,940 – Clinton (20%) 789,471 – Neither (2%) 78,947
Trump – 14,733,779 > Trump (96%) 14,144,428 – Clinton (3.9%) 574,618 – Neither (.1%) 14,733

O’Malley – 124,072 > Clinton (100%) 124,072
Sanders – 13,794,371 > Clinton (90%) 12,414,934 – Trump (9%) 1,241,494 – Neither (1%) 137,943
Clinton – 15,169,316 > Clinton (95%) 14,410,851 – Trump (4%) 606,772 – Neither (1%) 151,693

Now we’ll add to it the Other and Undecided votes from both parties and their respective segments above, and their vote shifts according to the PRC chart.

Other Republican – 4% – 1,559,845 > Trump (76%) 1,185,482 – Clinton (19%) 296,371 – Neither (5%) 77,992
Undecided Republican – 14% – 1,887,385 > Trump (68%) 1,283,421 – Clinton (15%) 283,107 – Neither (17%) 320,855

Other Democrat – 2% – 880,969 > Clinton (80%) 704,775 – Trump (10%) 88,097 – Neither (10%) 88,097
Undecided Democrat – 14% – 1,742,457 > Clinton (73%) 1,271,994 – Trump (18%) 313,642 – Neither (9%) 156,821

Now it’s time to add them all up and see what we get.

Trump – 29,798,508 – 47.39%
Clinton – 31,746,176 – 50.49 %
Neither – 1,335,090 – 2.12%
Grand total combined votes – 62,879,774


In conclusion …

So there we have it, folks. Of course, this isn’t the end of the story. There are still almost 3 months until the general election on November 7, 2016. A lot could change between now and then. Hell, a lot could change between now and next week. I’m anxious to see if the Pew Research Center does another poll between now and the election, and if they do, I’ll update these numbers with their polls.

Of course, this says nothing of how the Electoral College will vote, either. This could be another squeaker, or we could end up with SCOTUS deciding the election, which would be pretty interesting considering we’re down a member.

 

* All sources included either in links here or on my chart on Google Drive. I’ve quadruple checked my math at each calculation. While my math may be flawless, my logic might be a little off. I’m open to any constructive criticism of the work I’ve done here. It’s taken me months to compile all of this information in a way that was easy to read and understand. *

It’s all Bush’s fault!

October 7, 2010 Leave a comment

Yesterday, a friend of mine sent me an email asking for help. She had a Repuke friend of hers posting an article that she just knew was way off base, but didn’t know where to begin looking for the correct information.

So, I spent the time to help her out. That’s what friends are for, right? 🙂

 


 

Here is the article:
http://www.aurorasentinel.com/opinion/columnists/article_008243b2-1535-58e9-a4b8-75ad20b402a4.html

I also posted a reply, but had to clean it up a bit, since it flagged me for profanity. I guess they can’t tell the difference between the letter “s” and the Cyrillic Small Letter “Dze” (which looks identical to an “s”). LOL

Here is my original reply, for those mature enough to handle a little profanity:

As for all the promises that Obama hasn’t been able to keep, maybe this douchebag writing the article thinks that Obama has a magic wand that he can just wave and make it all happen. Unfortunately, the idiot has a problem with his memory AND his ability to think logically. Obama has busted aѕѕ to make some major changes, DESPITE the “Party of NO” obstructing everything he’s tried to do.

“broke Obama’s promise for a new era of bipartisan cooperation in all matters.” ?? – Nobody is blaming Bush for that, we’re blaming the hypocritical Repukes, who will stop at nothing to say “NO!” to anything that Obama tries to do, even when those same Repukes are the ones that came up with the idea(s) in the first place!!

Yes, Bush is to blame for the outrageous deficit, budget and unemployment, because he spent 8 years totally screwing up our country financially. No sane, logical person would expect those problems to A) not get worse before they get better, and B) clear up instantly. Cleaning up the mess that Bush made is going to take a long time … longer if those same Repukes that backed Bush’s ideas originally keep obstructing the very things that will help to repair our country.

For information about what promises Obama has and hasn’t kept, click here:
http://politifact.com/truth-o-meter/promises/

 


 

I also took some time to research one of the claims made, about Obama’s approval rating being the “fastest dive ever”. This was easy to refute, but it took me a bit of time to really break it down to write about it.

This is what I came up with:

“Fastest dive in popularity ever.” = FALSE

http://www.gallup.com/poll/124922/Presidential-Approval-Center.aspx


You’ll get an approval rating chart. Click on Truman, Ford, Reagan and Obama. Hover over any point in time, and you’ll see how many days in office, and the percentage of approval.

In Truman’s first week, he was at 87%; in Ford’s first week, he was at 71%; Reagan’s first week was 51%; Obama’s first week was 66%.

At 28 days into it, their numbers were 87%, 66%, 60%, and 62% respectively. Reagan was the only one to have an increase.

By day 100, some bounced back and some didn’t. But notice how Ford was at 48%. Obama is still at roughly the same as it was in the beginning, at 65%.

By day 150, we see a drastic drop for Ford, to 37%. There’s also a major drop for Reagan – 59%, though still not lower than his first week. Obama drops a little bit to 59%.

When we hit day 300, Ford is the only one above 50% (at 52%), while the rest are all sitting at 49%. Yep, even Reagan, who had a steady drop in approval after the first 100 days in office.

But that’s not all. By day 450, Obama ranks the HIGHEST out of these 4 at 48%. Truman is at the lowest with 33%. Ford gets 44% and Reagan (still not at his lowest) at 43%. Reagan will hit his lowest point (35%) in 1983, 2 years after taking office.

If we look at current numbers, Truman was at 48%, Ford was at 47%, Obama is at 46%, and Reagan was at 42%. This is at 621 days in office, which is the latest report for Obama.

As for the rest of the stuff on the link, I’ll have to do more research. But just off the top of my head, the largest budget ever, I know that’s incorrect. If they’re comparing apples to oranges (today’s dollar figures to the dollar figures of 50+ years ago), they’re going to LOOK bigger. But if you compare the figures the way you should be, then I’m fairly certain that the budget during the depression of the 30’s is larger.

As for the deficit, they neglect to take into account that until Obama took office, it was G.W. Bush who held the title of the largest deficit … which Obama INHERITED, along with 2 wars that weren’t budgeted for, and huge tax cuts for the rich that add to the deficit.

And I’ve only read the first paragraph at that link! Oy!



 

I would love to hear from someone who has exact data on the budget and deficit. Anything else that can be added to this would be helpful as well. I will pass along all of the information I receive to my friend.

Rebutting a Repuke is always a good thing. 😉

 

Political Compass

October 7, 2009 Leave a comment

The other day, after a discussion with a couple of friends, I got to thinking about what label I’d give myself, as far as political persuasion goes. I’ve seen some cheesy little quizzes on MySpace and Facebook that ask you a dozen questions, and expect to put you into a neat little category based on how “left” or “right” you are. But something just didn’t sit right with me. I lean towards Democrat on some things, and Republican on others.

So, I went searching, trying to find a way to find out a bit more about my beliefs, and if they fall into something quite different than what I’d assumed I was. One of my friends thought maybe I might be a Libertarian. I wasn’t even sure what that was, to be completely honest. *sigh* More research. Like I needed more of that in my life. LOL

Anyway, to get to the point, I found this great, wonderfully comprehensive site called The Political Compass. There are quite a few questions that they ask, and your answers fall into one of 4 categories: Strongly Agree, Agree, Disagree, or Strongly Disagree. Once completed, you’ll have a wonderful idea of where you sit, politically. An excerpt from the front page:

“The idea was developed by a political journalist with a university counselling background, assisted by a professor of social history. They’re indebted to people like Wilhelm Reich and Theodor Adorno for their ground-breaking work in this field. We believe that, in an age of diminishing ideology, a new generation in particular will get a better idea of where they stand politically – and the sort of political company they keep.”

Now, go take the test! Go ahead … I’ll wait. I have more to talk about, but don’t want to give too much away before you’ve completed it. Don’t scroll down until you’ve taken the test for yourself.

Tick

Tock

Hurry along, I’ll still be here when you’re done.

Tap

Tap

Well, what are you waiting for? Go already!

Ok, done? Good, now I can get into some deeper conversation about the test and results.

Just in case you’re curious about my results, here they are:

My results

As you can see, I fall right in the middle of Left, and middle of Libertarian. I guess my friend was at least partially right about me. What I found interesting was that my score fell very close to that of Gandhi, The Dalai Lama, and Nelson Mandela. WOW!

Historical figures
Historical figures

You’ll notice that I’m at the opposite end of the spectrum from alot of (ok, most of) the world’s politicians, not the least of which is Hitler. But what I found the most intriguing of all, is how many of our politicians are very close to where Hitler falls on the spectrum.

This first chart is from the 2008 Presidential Election. Take particular notice to where Sarah Palin and John McCain are on the chart. I have to say that Palin is WAY too close to Hitler for my liking, and should be for everyone else, as well! I mean, how scary is that?!

2008 US politicians

I would love to see more current results, as people’s political views change over time, although not too drastically, as you can see from the chart of the 2008 Primaries:

2008 US politicians

I would also like to see some more politicians and political figures, such as Supreme Court Justices and Senators and Congressmen. Also, people like those on Faux Noise, like Glenn Beck and Bill O’Reilly, who I’m guessing would fall even closer to Hitler than Palin. I suppose it wouldn’t be too difficult, given that their ideals are pretty public and well known.

So, where do you rank on this social-political spectrum?

Oh, and I thought I should mention that the FAQ page is very informative. And also, this site has been around since 2001, long before people like Obama and Palin were household names.

The Republican Plan for Healthcare

September 30, 2009 Leave a comment

*Thank you Pelauria for pointing me in the direction of this.

Rep. Alan Grayson, (D-FL)  (Orlando area) ripped the GOP to shreds with his speech. I hope they’re listening!

Well, judging by the reaction over on “The Situation Room”, they heard him, but weren’t really listening.

So, an apology is in order, huh? Comparing his speech to Joe Wilson’s “You Lie!” remark? Seriously?

And Grayson is a “freshman” … a new politician? WOW!!

I hope, that when we finally move to Florida, into his district, that
he’s still there! THIS is the kind of politician I want speaking for me!